Chicago Cubs Make Controversial Decision After Placing Catcher Miguel Amaya on IL
In a move that has sparked debate across the Cubs fanbase and around Major League Baseball, the Chicago Cubs made a controversial roster decision following the placement of catcher Miguel Amaya on the 10-day injured list due to a wrist strain sustained during a recent series against the Pittsburgh Pirates.
While the injury to Amaya—considered one of the Cubs’ most promising young players—was disappointing news in itself, the team’s response has proven to be even more polarizing. Instead of recalling a traditional backup catcher or promoting a minor league talent from Triple-A Iowa, the Cubs have opted to carry just one full-time catcher on the active roster—veteran Yan Gomes—and use utility player Miles Mastrobuoni as an emergency backup.
An Unconventional and Risky Call
The decision to not replace Amaya with a second catcher immediately drew criticism from fans and analysts alike, with many questioning the wisdom of placing that much pressure on the aging Gomes, especially during a crucial stretch of the season.
“Miguel Amaya’s absence is a blow, but what’s more concerning is how the front office is choosing to patch the hole,” said MLB Network analyst and former catcher A.J. Pierzynski. “Relying on a utility man with minimal catching experience to back up a 36-year-old starter is asking for trouble.”
Manager Craig Counsell, however, defended the choice during a pregame media session, saying the flexibility of the bench and Mastrobuoni’s versatility offers the team more options in the short term.
“We’ve looked at the matchups, the off-days coming up, and where we are health-wise across the roster,” Counsell said. “We’re confident we can manage the workload and keep Yan fresh. Mastro has worked behind the plate in emergency situations and in practice. It’s not ideal, but it gives us depth elsewhere.”
Why Not Promote a Catcher?
Many fans were left wondering why the Cubs didn’t simply promote P.J. Higgins or Bryce Windham—two capable catchers currently at Triple-A Iowa. Both are known for their defensive abilities and game management, even if their offensive output is modest.
Sources inside the organization suggest that roster crunches and 40-man considerations may have played a role in the decision. Additionally, with several relievers returning from injury and the bullpen requiring reinforcement, the Cubs chose to prioritize arms over a backup catcher for the time being.
Still, critics argue that the risk outweighs the reward.
“If Gomes goes down or takes a foul tip off the hand, then what?” asked Jesse Rogers of ESPN Chicago. “You’re looking at a worst-case scenario that could cost you multiple games—and in a division as tight as the NL Central, that’s the kind of mistake that comes back to haunt you.”
Fan Reaction and Clubhouse Mood
The decision has not only lit up social media but also stirred tension among fans who are already frustrated with the team’s up-and-down performance this season. #BringUpHiggins trended on Twitter/X shortly after the announcement, with many fans urging the front office to rethink the strategy.
Inside the clubhouse, however, the tone remains cautiously optimistic. Gomes, a 12-year MLB veteran, downplayed the situation, expressing confidence in his ability to handle the increased workload.
“I’ve done this before,” Gomes said. “Obviously we’re hoping Amaya’s back soon, but until then, I’m ready for whatever the team needs. Mastro is a great athlete—if it came down to it, I’d help guide him through it.”
Mastrobuoni, for his part, acknowledged the unusual ask but said he’s willing to step up if needed.
“I’ve been taking some reps in the bullpen just in case,” he said with a grin. “It’s not how I pictured contributing, but I’ll be ready.”
Looking Ahead
The Cubs are entering a pivotal portion of the season, with a crucial road trip on the horizon and playoff aspirations still alive, albeit tenuously. The timeline for Amaya’s return is unclear, though early reports suggest he could miss two to three weeks depending on how quickly the inflammation subsides.
In the meantime, the front office is walking a tightrope between roster flexibility and game-day functionality. If the gamble pays off, it may be remembered as a bold, savvy move. But if things go south—especially behind the plate—it could become a defining misstep in a season filled with thin margins.
One thing is certain: the Cubs’ unconventional approach has everyone watching closely—and hoping it doesn’t come back to bite them.