The Mystery of the Giants: The Hideout of Legendary Creatures

I have always been fascinated by the stories of giants, the giant in Jack and the Beanstalk, the giant lantern genie in the tales of the Thousand and One Nights, the giant robots in science fiction films… They are mighty beings, we love to see and hear their stories because they emit in our souls a mixture of strength, vanity and mystery, and who does not love to be strong? And strength is often characterized by vanity, an acceptable vanity when you are the length of a three-story building, because whether you like it or not, you are compelled to look arrogantly at those little ones who run under your feet. And this arrogance, full of mighty power, is also the source of the mystery surrounding these giants, because it makes us wonder how they reached their size? How did they come into existence and how did they live? .. And the most important question is why did they disappear? And did they ever exist, or did they never exist except in the world of myths and legends?

Do we know everything?
Of course, if you asked a historian or biologist about the giant sitting on top of the gigantic beanstalk that grew in Jack’s garden, he would laugh and he would answer you confidently: “There are no giants.”
but how ? .. What about all that folklore and religious heritage about them, how can they not exist? .. You will inevitably ask, and he will answer you, saying: “Ok, if they existed, where are their remains? .. Their traces.. Their cities.. We know that dinosaurs are giant creatures that actually lived on Earth millions of years ago because we have thousands of fossilized skeletons that indicate their existence , while we did not find a single skeleton belonging to a giant.”

Scientific speech is sound, but let us ask innocently: Do scientists know everything? ..

They tell us that modern human appeared and colonized this earth about two hundred thousand years ago, but what do we know about these thousands of years? …almost nothing! .. Most of our knowledge of human history is almost limited to the last five thousand years, and let us be more specific, since man learned to write and left us records of his life, beliefs, kings, wars and cities. Writing is the standard of knowledge, and for this reason, scholars know a lot about aspects of ancient life in the Ancient egypt and Mesopotamia, because the peoples who founded those two civilizations left us millions of hieroglyphic papyrus scrolls and cuneiform clay tablets to the extent that many of them are still in the museums vaults arount the world, waiting to be deciphered and read.. But what do we know in return about Britain’s history before the Roman invasion in 43 AD? ..

almost nothing..

Is this reasonable! Great Britain, “The empire on which the sun never sets”… Its ancient history is unknown?

Yes, this is true, and the reason is simply that the ancient “British” were not fond of writing and reading and did not know it at all. They were barbarians, they did not leave us any information about themselves, and for this reason scholars today stand puzzled in front of a great historical monument like Stonehenge without knowing anything about Who built it and why was it built in the first place? All they have are conflicting historical accounts left by medieval historians that scholars refuse to believe, such as that the famous magician Merlin brought a people of giants who inhabited Ireland in ancient times and used them to move the huge rocks and build this majestic edifice.

A legend that’s hard to believe, isn’t it? .. But if these are just myths, how can we explain the construction of great edifices such as Stonehenge and the pyramids by using simple and dilapidated wooden levers and cranes? Doesn’t that seem impossible? .

In Baalbek, Lebanon, there is a great boulder carved out of stone called (The Pregnant Woman). This rock was cut from the stone quarries in the south of the city and carefully polished its sides. It is 21 meters long and weighs about 1500 tons. It is a giant rock in every sense of the word, but its size is not the only cause of mystery in it. Scientists do not know who cut it and how he was able to move it from its place and transport it for a long distance. It is supposed that it was prepared to be part of the luxurious temples built by the Romans throughout the city, but scholars today believe that its age dates back to an era older than that, perhaps in the time of Alexander the Great. The problem here is that they do not know who was living in the city at the time, because Baalbek emerged as a city and became famous after the reign of Alexander, when it became known as Heliopolis, meaning the city of the sun. Before that, its history is surrounded by mystery, but it is known that the area was ancient home to the Phoenicians and Canaanites, and the evidence for this is that its name is of Semitic origin (Baal = Lord or Master), and therefore It is not excluded that the owners of the rock were Canaanites, And the Bible tells us that some of those Canaanites were giants, which leaves us in front of two hypotheses. As for those who cut the rock and moved it had advanced equipment and cranes similar to those we have today, and this is not consistent with the copper chisels and wood levers that the ancients owned. As for those who cut the rock and moved it had enormous physical strength, to be more precise, they were giants, and therefore they did not find much difficulty in moving and lifting this huge rock.
Someone might say that this is pure nonsense.. just the legends of the ancients..

Probably ..

But wasn’t Troy just a legend that Homer narrated to us in his poems that he wrote in his famous epic, The Iliad, and scholars used to meet the existence of the city with a sarcastic smile, until suddenly a German merchant fond of antiquities appeared to us ,his name was Heinrich Schliemann, he went with his wife to Turkey and extracted for us the remains of the city of Troy from Under the dirt in 1870, guided by the poems of the Iliad, which everyone has considered for centuries a myth! .

And weren’t the stories of the lost Inca cities also a myth, until an unknown American explorer named Hiram Bingham visited the Andes Mountains in Peru in 1911, there an eleven-year-old Inca child guided him to the ruins of a great city that lies above the clouds, Machu Picchu, the holy lost city that scientists were dumbfounded by its discovery. They used to ridicule its existence and consider talking about it just a myth, while it was for four centuries, towering with its great stone edifices on the mountain and mocking their ignorance and arrogance.

These simple examples clearly show us that scientists do not know everything, and that human history is full of dark gaps and missing links, the ancient egyptians, for example, left us a record of everything, their gods, their priests, their lives, their rituals, their harvest seasons, their floods, their taxes, their wars etc.. They even mentioned the name of the woman who was combing the queen’s hair! but they neglected or deliberately not to mention the most important and greatest achievements of their civilization .. the pyramids.

Related Posts

Eloп Mυsk Calls for Boycott of ABC Network: “Let’s Take ‘Em Dowп!”

In yet another dramatic twist in the ever-spiraling 2024 political saga, techbillionaire and part-time Twitter disruptor Elon Musk has thrown his weight behind afull-fledged boycott of ABC Network following the recent presidential debate. Aftera polarizing event that left both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris supportersfuming over the moderators’ handling, Musk took to his preferredplatform—formerly known as Twitter, now simply “X”—to declare war on the mediagiant, calling for a nationwide boycott. His message was direct, succinct, and, of course, classic Musk: “ABC’s bias is offthe charts. Let’s take ‘em down. #BoycottABC.” And with that, the gauntlet hadbeen thrown. It all began with the much-anticipated Trump vs. Harris presidential debate, wheretensions were already running high. The moderators, David Muir and Linsey Davis,found themselves fact-checking Donald Trump mid-sentence more times thanMusk fact-checks his engineers at SpaceX. And while Trump took offense at beinginterrupted, Harris, on the other hand, was criticized for receiving what many onthe right considered “softball” questions. The result? Chaos on stage and an onlinefrenzy once the event ended. Supporters of both candidates took to social media to accuse ABC of being biasedin favor of the other side. Trump fans slammed the network for “rigging” the debatein Harris’s favor, while Harris’s supporters accused ABC of not pressing Trump hardenough on his claims. It was a political mess, but for Elon Musk, it was more thanjust bad moderation—it was a call to action. “ABC’s coverage is as outdated as gas-powered cars,” Musk tweeted. “Time toboycott this biased network. We’re better off with no debates than with thesecircus shows. Let’s take ‘em down.” The tweet, which garnered over 500,000 likes in under an hour, was quicklyfollowed by a hashtag campaign: #BoycottABC. Musk’s legions of fans, rangingfrom crypto enthusiasts to Tesla fanboys, jumped on board, turning the call for aboycott into one of the top trending topics on X. But the tech mogul didn’t stop there. As if leading the digital charge wasn’t enough,Musk went on to suggest alternative ways to hold future debates. “Why not streamthe debates on X?” Musk suggested. “No filters, no biased moderators—juststraight talk. We’ll make it happen, and you can bet there won’t be anyinterruptions when the candidates speak.” Musk’s crusade against ABC is just the latest in his ongoing feud with traditionalmedia. For years, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO has railed against what he sees ascorporate media’s bias and inefficiency. Whether it’s calling out news organizationsfor what he considers unfair coverage of his companies or sparking debates aboutfreedom of speech, Musk has long made it clear that he sees social media anddirect communication as the future of news. And now, Musk has taken things one step further by not just criticizing but activelytrying to take down a media titan. “Mainstream media has had a stranglehold oninformation for too long,” Musk tweeted later in the night. “The people deservebetter. We deserve unbiased coverage, not corporate manipulation.” As you might expect, his followers took up the charge with enthusiasm, with manyproclaiming that they were canceling their ABC subscriptions, deleting the app, andeven suggesting an all-out ban of Disney+ (ABC’s parent company). “I’m done withthem,” tweeted one Musk devotee. “Elon is right. They’re a relic of the past. Timefor the people to take control of the conversation.” As Musk’s call for a boycott spread across social media, reactions from political andmedia figures were swift. Predictably, conservatives embraced Musk’s message,praising him for “standing up to the corrupt media” and for “taking on theestablishment.” The idea of streaming future debates directly through X was metwith excitement among Trump supporters, who have long argued that traditionalnetworks unfairly favor their opponents. On the other hand, critics were quick to point out Musk’s blatant disregard forjournalistic integrity and fairness. “Elon Musk thinks he can take down a majormedia network because he doesn’t like how a debate was moderated? Please,” onecommentator quipped. “This is just another billionaire trying to control thenarrative.” ABC, of course, was not amused. In a statement released shortly after Musk’stweetstorm, a network spokesperson called Musk’’s boycott call “reckless andbaseless,” arguing that the moderators did their best to keep the debate on trackand factual. “We stand by our moderators and the job they did in providing a fairand balanced debate,” the statement read. “ABC has always been committed tojournalistic integrity and will not be swayed by pressure from outside forces.” Disney, which owns ABC, has remained silent on the matter, though rumors arecirculating that the company’s executives are now considering the PR ramificationsof Musk’s boycott campaign. Never one to pass up an opportunity to go big (or to space), Musk didn’t stop withhis calls for a boycott. In a subsequent series of tweets, Musk floated the idea ofhosting future debates on Mars. “Maybe it’s time we take politics off Earth,” Muskjoked. “Imagine the candidates debating inside a SpaceX Starship on their way tocolonize Mars. No biased moderators—just zero gravity and the future of humanityat stake The internet, of course, exploded with excitement at the mere suggestion, withmemes of Trump and Harris debating in spacesuits quickly taking over socialmedia. While Musk’s Mars debate might be a few years (or centuries) away, hisbroader point was clear: the future of political discourse needs a shake-up, andABC isn’t cutting it. As #BoycottABC continues to trend, it remains to be seen just how far Musk’smovement will go. Will ABC see a noticeable dip in viewership or subscriptions as aresult of his call to arms? Or will the network stand firm, weathering the storm asjust another example of the polarized political landscape? One thing is certain: Elon Musk, with his legions of followers and seemingly endlessenergy, won’t be backing down any time soon. Whether he’s calling for boycotts,streaming debates on X, or floating the idea of zero-gravity political showdowns,Musk has solidified his place as one of the most influential—andunpredictable—figures in modern discourse. As for ABC? They’ll likely keep airing debates for now, but they might want to keepan eye on the skies. With Elon Musk in the picture, you never know when the nextdebate might be streamed live from space.

SHOCK NEWS : Jeппa Ortega Lost $120 Millioп Aпd The Movie “WEDNESDAY” Her Actor Was Also “BANNED” Worldwide Becaυse She ” ADMITTING ” To Sleepiпg With Diddy (VIDEO)

In a stunning turn of events, actress Jenna Ortega is rumored to have lost astaggering $120 million in earnings, with the global broadcast of her hit seriesWednesday reportedly banned. The controversy centers around allegations thatOrtega engaged in an inappropriate relationship with music mogul Diddy, sparkingimmense backlash. Sources claim that Ortega’s alleged actions were an attempt tosecure a higher-profile role and greater financial gains, but these unconfirmedallegations have caused a ripple effect across the entertainment industry, leadingto massive fallout.= The series Wednesday, where Ortega plays the titular character, quickly became aglobal sensation, cementing her as one of the most sought-after young actressesin Hollywood. However, these new allegations have cast a dark cloud over herburgeoning career. Industry insiders suggest that Ortega’s alleged connection withDiddy was part of an effort to fast-track her success, but the backlash following theleaked information has led to intense scrutiny. Several major media outlets havereported that Wednesday has now been pulled from international streamingplatforms, further fueling speculation about the extent of the scandal. The purported loss of $120 million stems from multiple endorsement deals,sponsorships, and future acting contracts that are said to have been abruptlycanceled as a result of the controversy. Ortega, who had once been seen as arising star in Hollywood, now faces a critical moment in her career, as her branddeals and projects come under review. If the allegations prove true, it could spell asignificant downturn for her professional trajectory. The allegations have also impacted the broader landscape of the entertainmentindustry, especially regarding the power dynamics between prominent figures.Diddy, a renowned figure in both the music and business world, has facednumerous allegations over the years, but this recent scandal adds a new layer ofcomplexity to the conversation around influence, exploitation, and morality inHollywood. Fans of Wednesday have taken to social media to express their shock and dismayat the sudden ban. Many have called for greater transparency from both Ortegaand Diddy regarding the details of their alleged relationship. Others have urged fora re-evaluation of how young stars are thrust into compromising situations toachieve success, questioning whether the pressures of fame contributed to thecontroversy. At the center of the uproar is the moral question of how much power and influencecan be used behind closed doors in Hollywood, and whether this dynamic allows forfair competition in the industry. While there have been no official statements fromOrtega or Diddy as of yet, the controversy continues to build as public interestgrows. Various entertainment watchdogs are reportedly investigating the claims,while major networks are distancing themselves from the scandal. Despite the intensity of the situation, there is still uncertainty surrounding thevalidity of the allegations. Without concrete evidence or official confirmation fromreliable sources, it remains to be seen how this will unfold. However, the currentmedia frenzy highlights a growing awareness of the ethical issues within theentertainment industry, and the potential consequences for those involved. The ramifications of this scandal may extend far beyond Ortega and Diddy. It callsinto question the broader power dynamics at play in the entertainment world andraises concerns about how stars, particularly women, may be exploited for theirsuccess. If proven true, this situation could lead to reforms in how contracts arenegotiated, how scandals are handled, and how the industry protects its stars fromsituations where their reputations—and entire careers—are at risk. As the story develops, it will be important to watch for official statements fromJenna Ortega, Diddy, and the companies involved in the series Wednesday. Thelegal implications could be substantial, and the future of Ortega’s career maydepend on how the public, media, and entertainment industry respond to theunfolding drama.

SH0CKING NEWS: North West Reveals How Kim Kardashiaп Slept With Diddy For $100M Aпd Cheated With Kaпye West.

This article revolves around a controversial claim allegedly made by North West,the daughter of Kim Kardashian and Kanye West, involving Kim Kardashian’sprivate life. The claim suggests that Kim had an affair with music producer Diddyfor $100 million while also cheating on Kanye West. Such accusations are bound tocreate controversy and raise questions about the credibility of the informationpresented. The first priority for any responsible journalist is to verify the accuracy of theseallegations. Relying on rumors or unverified information can cause significant harmto the individuals involved. In this case, it’s important to reach out to relevantsources, such as representatives of Kim Kardashian, Diddy, or other individualsclose to the matter, to clarify these claims. If the information cannot be clearly and reliably substantiated, the article mustemphasize that these are unproven allegations and avoid drawing conclusions thatcould damage the reputations of those involved. Information regarding the personal lives of public figures always garners publicattention. However, it is essential to consider the negative effects that rumors canhave on the parties involved, including their families and children. Digging intopersonal details and circulating misinformation can lead to psychological pressureand tarnish their public image. Additionally, society should question the role of media in disseminating informationabout the private lives of celebrities. Responsible handling and control ofinformation can help prevent the spread of false rumors and protect the privacy ofindividuals. Publishing rumors or false accusations about a public figure’s personal life can leadto legal repercussions. In many cases, individuals affected by such misinformationmay seek compensation for damages to their reputation and dignity. Laws incountries like the United States and many Western nations have strict regulationsregarding the public disclosure of personal information, and media outlets must beheld accountable for disseminating false or defamatory claims. In summary, the claim that North West revealed details about Kim Kardashian’salleged affair with Diddy and Kanye West is shocking but must be approached withcaution. Writers and journalists have a responsibility to verify the accuracy of theirinformation before publication, to protect both the credibility of journalism and thereputation of the individuals involved. Spreading false information and ignoring theprivacy of public figures can lead to significant harm and legal consequences.

Beп Affleck RAGES At JLo After Diddy & JLo

Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez’s Marriage Faces Turmoil Amid Leaked FBI FootageInvolving Diddy Ben Affleck is reportedly struggling to maintain his composure following the releaseof controversial FBI footage featuring his wife, Jennifer Lopez, and herex-boyfriend, Sean “Diddy” Combs This explosive footage has ignited widespread speculation, raising concerns aboutthe future of Affleck and Lopez’s marriage. The tension between the couple, whichhas been simmering for some time, may now be reaching a breaking point. Affleck and Lopez’s reunion in 2021, nearly 20 years after their initial romance,captivated fans worldwide. The couple, affectionately dubbed “Bennifer,” seemed to pick up right where theyleft off, eventually tying the knot in a low-key Las Vegas ceremony in July 2022.While the public celebrated their second chance at love, reports of discord behindclosed doors have persisted. Despite their efforts to present a united front, insiders have hinted at growingtensions between the pair. Rumors of arguments and struggles to keep theirrelationship intact have been circulating for months, despite efforts by theirrepresentatives to downplay such reports. The release of FBI footage has thrown their already shaky relationship into furtherturmoil. The footage allegedly reveals connections between Lopez and Diddy thathave long been kept under wraps, potentially linking her to illegal activities from herpast. These revelations have reportedly shocked Affleck, who has always beenprotective of Lopez, making this discovery especially difficult for him to process.This scandal comes at a particularly challenging time for Affleck, who has battledaddiction and the pressures of Hollywood throughout his life. Sources suggest that the strain of this new controversy could be pushing theirmarriage to the brink, with trust between the couple seemingly eroding as moredetails emerge. Lopez’s history with Diddy has been a controversial chapter in her life, particularlydue to their involvement in a 1999 nightclub shooting in Manhattan. Although Lopez was not charged, the incident cast a long shadow over her career.The resurfacing of this scandal through leaked FBI footage threatens to reopen oldwounds and bring new challenges to her relationship with Affleck. Amid the unfolding drama, Affleck has reportedly been leaning on his ex-wife,Jennifer Garner, who has been a consistent source of support even after theirdivorce. Garner’s involvement suggests that Affleck may be struggling to cope withthe pressures of his high-profile marriage and the resurfacing of Lopez’s past.Additionally, blending their families has proven difficult, with reported tensionbetween Affleck’s family and Lopez, particularly during the holidays. These familydynamics, combined with Affleck’s ongoing battle with addiction, have furthercomplicated an already precarious situation. As the leaked FBI footage continues to circulate, fans are left wondering whetherAffleck and Lopez’s marriage can withstand this latest scandal. Online commentaryhas been intense, with many speculating that this could mark the beginning of theend for Hollywood’s most talked-about couple. The future remains uncertain for Affleck and Lopez as they navigate this crisis.Whether their relationship can survive this latest challenge or if it will crumbleunder the weight of public scrutiny remains to be seen.

New Party Footage of Diddy, Sпoop Dog aпd Jay-Z Chaпges Everythiпg (Video)

Uпraveliпg the Coпtroversy: New Developmeпts Sυrroυпd Diddy, Sпoop Dogg, aпd Jay-Z Amid Scaпdals Iп a series of υпfoldiпg eveпts, the eпtertaiпmeпt iпdυstry has beeп shakeп by shockiпg…

Breakiпg: Deпzel Washiпgtoп, Sylvester Stalloпe, aпd Cliпt Eastwood have takeп a heroic oath to defeпd Hollywood agaiпst Woke Cυltυre

In a surprising and bold declaration that has sent shockwaves through theentertainment industry, Hollywood icons Denzel Washington, Sylvester Stallone,and Clint Eastwood have announced a joint initiative to combat what they describeas the encroachment of “woke culture” in the film and television landscape. Thistrio of legendary actors, each with decades of cinematic achievements, has taken apublic oath to uphold traditional values in storytelling and to defend artisticexpression against what they perceive as excessive political correctness. The announcement comes at a time when the entertainment industry is grapplingwith profound changes, particularly around issues of representation, inclusivity, andsocial responsibility. In recent years, discussions surrounding “wokeness” havedominated conversations in Hollywood, with many filmmakers and actorsadvocating for diverse narratives that reflect contemporary societal issues.However, Washington, Stallone, and Eastwood contend that these shifts have ledto a stifling of creative freedom, claiming that artists are increasingly pressured toconform to prevailing ideological standards. In a press conference held at a historic theater in Los Angeles, the three actorsoutlined their commitment to preserving the integrity of filmmaking. “We believe inthe power of storytelling as a means to explore the human experience,” Washingtonstated emphatically. “Art should provoke thought and debate, not be confined bythe constraints of political correctness.” Stallone echoed his sentiments, adding,“When storytelling becomes dictated by ideology, we lose the very essence ofwhat makes cinema great.” The term “woke culture” has become a point of contention in public discourse,often used to describe heightened awareness of social issues and advocacy formarginalized voices. However, it has also been criticized by those who argue that itcreates a culture of censorship, where artists feel unable to express themselvesfreely without fear of backlash. The actors’ decision to take a stand against thismovement highlights a growing divide within Hollywood, where traditionalists andprogressives increasingly clash over the direction of the industry. Washington, Stallone, and Eastwood are not new to controversy. Each of theseactors has carved out a reputation for challenging norms and pushing boundariesin their respective careers. Eastwood, known for his gritty westerns andthought-provoking dramas, has often tackled themes of masculinity and moralcomplexity. Stallone’s iconic roles in action films have solidified his status as acultural symbol of resilience and determination. Washington, an AcademyAward-winning actor, has portrayed a diverse range of characters, oftenconfronting societal issues head-on. Their combined experience and influence lendconsiderable weight to their current endeavor. Critics of their initiative argue that it represents a resistance to progress in anindustry that has historically marginalized diverse voices. Many feel that the trio’sstance is an attempt to cling to outdated paradigms in storytelling, which haveoften overlooked the experiences of women, people of color, and LGBTQ+individuals. Social media reactions have been mixed, with some applauding theircourage to speak out against perceived overreach, while others lambaste them forperpetuating a narrative that dismisses the importance of inclusivity. Supporters of Washington, Stallone, and Eastwood argue that their commitment toartistic integrity is crucial in a time when creative expression is often under threat.They contend that the ability to tell stories freely, without fear of retribution orcancellation, is essential for the health of the industry. This perspective resonateswith a segment of the audience that feels disenchanted by the perceivedhomogenization of content and the prioritization of political correctness overstorytelling quality. As the debate rages on, the actors’ move has sparked discussions about the role ofart in society and the responsibilities of creators. Some advocates for diversityargue that artistic expression should evolve to include a wider range ofperspectives, while others maintain that traditional storytelling methods still holdvalue. The contrast between these viewpoints exemplifies the complexitiessurrounding the notion of “wokeness” and its impact on the creative process. In response to the backlash, Washington, Stallone, and Eastwood have emphasizedtheir dedication to dialogue and open discussions about these issues. They havecalled for a more nuanced conversation about the intersection of art and politics,urging fellow creators to engage in constructive debates rather than resorting tocancellation or silencing dissenting voices. The actors’ oath to defend Hollywood from what they perceive as wokeness mayresonate with certain segments of the audience, particularly those who feeldisillusioned by recent trends in entertainment. However, it remains to be seen howthis initiative will influence their careers and the broader landscape of Hollywood.The industry’s response to their declaration could set the tone for futureconversations around artistic expression and inclusivity. As the entertainment world continues to navigate these challenges, the actions ofWashington, Stallone, and Eastwood serve as a reminder of the ongoing struggleto balance artistic freedom with social responsibility. Their commitment todefending traditional storytelling methods may resonate with some, but it alsounderscores the need for continued dialogue about the future of film and television.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *