]

BREAKING NEWS: Why does a $30 million fee make the Buffalo Bills hesitate in pursuing a star wide receiver despite a lack of depth in the lineup?

After coming up short once more in their pursuit of a Super Bowl appearance, the Buffalo Bills took a rather unorthodox approach to reloading their offense ahead of the 2025 NFL season, saying goodbye to Amari Cooper in favor of a more scattershot approach to the position with the additions of Joshua Palmer, Elijah Moore and Laviska Shenault Jr.

What gives? Why did the Bills opt against securing a WR1 like they did last offseason, when they had to trade for Cooper midseason and give up assets to correct that mistake? Well, as Dan Graziano pointed out in an offseason breakdown for ESPN, Buffalo simply doesn’t want to be in the $30 million wide receiver game, as they believe that the market has become too rich for the team’s blood.

Amari Cooper scores on his first catch with the Bills - Yahoo Sports

“There are several teams around the NFL, though, that think the receiver market has grown too much — upward of $30 million per year for the top guys — and don’t want to follow it there. The Bills, as last offseason’s Diggs trade indicates, are one of those teams. The number of talented receivers who enter the draft every year means teams can now find good production on cheap rookie deals,” Graziano wrote.

Related Buffalo Bills NewsArticle continues below

“The Bills would point out that they used the 33rd pick of last year’s draft on Keon Coleman, a player they expect to make a second-year jump in 2025. Shakir, meanwhile, caught 76 passes for 821 yards and four touchdowns last season and just turned 25. They also expect to get more out of 2023 first-round tight end Dalton Kincaid, and they like to throw to their running backs. Buffalo finished second in the NFL in points per game last season (30.9) without a star wideout, and as GM Brandon Beane pointed out in a postdraft radio appearance, that should offer fans some comfort and confidence that the team knows what it’s doing.”

As things presently stand, the Bills will open Week 1 with six wide receivers with legit NFL experience in Shakir, Coleman, Palmer, Moore, Shenault, and 2024 free agent addition Curtis Samuel.

While only time will tell who ends up playing what role or if another player will come out of nowhere to fly up the depth chart and become a star long-term, in a league where there are only so many true WR1s, the Bills are doing something different, paying six receivers instead of one and hoping that they can provide Josh Allen with optionality snap-in and snap-out. Will it work? Only time will tell, but more than a few eyes will be on Buffalo to see how it shakes out this fall.

Related Posts

Super Bowl Breaking News! Leaked Internal Memo Suggests CEO May Have Been “Coerced” Into Picking Bad Bunny as Headliner — And Further Revelations Expose the Hidden Power Connection Between the NFL and Hollywood

📄 The Memo That Shook the NFL The internal memo — marked Confidential: Executive Use Only — was reportedly sent from a senior figure in the NFL’s…

Bad Bunny officially speaks out amid the Super Bowl storm: “I don’t need to be loved, I just need to be heard!” — a seemingly simple statement that made the entire Super Bowl

A Storm Brewing for Weeks The controversy began earlier this month when leaked reports revealed alleged political and corporate interference in the NFL’s decision to select Bad…

The stands are at risk of being empty: A number of fans have announced a boycott of this year’s Super Bowl – but Bad Bunny believes…

A Boycott That No One Saw Coming The backlash began shortly after leaked reports revealed alleged “political and financial influences” behind Bad Bunny’s inclusion in the Super…

The Super Bowl has become more politicized than ever. A group of US lawmakers formally requested a federal investigation into the “murky relationship” between the Super Bowl CEO and Bad Bunny’s management company — but it was the documents that leaked afterward that really shocked the public

A Political Firestorm Brews Over Entertainment Deals The tension erupted earlier this week when a bipartisan coalition of senators and representatives submitted an open letter to the…

In a shocking chain reaction, a series of stars announced that they would withdraw from the Super Bowl if Bad Bunny was still kept on the performance list, amid a wave of fierce criticism and rumors that “he is hiding something that everyone is surprised about”

⚡ A Domino Effect of Boycotts Sources close to the NFL’s entertainment division confirmed to Variety Sports that at least four major guest performers — whose names…

Social media exploded like a storm: Bad Bunny became the center of fierce criticism when a series of Super Bowl fans called for a boycott of the entire event. However, the CEO still defied everything, signing a performance contract that stunned the whole of America with a total value of about

🔥 “Bad Bunny Does Not Represent America!” — Fans Erupt in Outrage Within hours of the announcement, hashtags such as #BoycottSuperBowl, #NoBadBunnyShow, and #SuperBowlSoldOutbegan trending at lightning…