Since Brian Gutekunst took over as general manager of the Green Bay Packers in 2018, he has made nine first-round picks, with a focus that reflects his strategic vision for the team. Among these picks, there have been seven defensive players, quarterback Jordan Love, and offensive lineman Jordan Morgan. While Gutekunst’s emphasis has largely been on fortifying the defense and securing the quarterback position for the future, there’s one glaring area where his strategy seems to differ from other teams in the league—wide receiver.
Although Gutekunst hasn’t ignored the wide receiver position, his approach to building the receiving corps is markedly different from that of other teams, particularly the Minnesota Vikings. While the Packers’ receiving room isn’t weak by any means, with players like Christian Watson and Jayden Reed, who were drafted in the second round, and Day 3 picks like Romeo Doubs and Dontayvion Wicks, the depth in Green Bay is impressive. However, when comparing the Packers’ receiving options to those of the Vikings, the difference becomes clear. The Vikings boast two first-round wide receivers, players who not only have the pedigree of a first-round selection but also deliver elite performances on the field, making life easier for everyone around them, including head coach Kevin O’Connell and quarterback Sam Darnold.
The contrast was evident during the recent game between the two teams. After the game, Packers head coach Matt LaFleur commented on the Vikings’ advantage in the receiving department, noting the presence of legitimate No. 1 receivers on their roster. “They get two legitimate number 1 receivers,” LaFleur said. “You get (Jalen) Nailor out there making play after play. They get a lot of weapons, (tight end TJ) Hockenson made some plays. We just collectively, as a unit, everybody gotta play a little bit better.”
On the Packers’ side, Romeo Doubs led the team with 58 receiving yards, a respectable performance, but not one that stood out compared to the Vikings’ wide receivers. Justin Jefferson, the Vikings’ star wideout, had eight receptions for 92 yards, while Jalen Nailor caught five passes for 81 yards and a touchdown. Jordan Addison contributed six receptions for 69 yards and a touchdown, and tight end TJ Hockenson added five catches for 68 yards. The numbers show that the Vikings’ offense, powered by multiple elite receiving threats, is significantly more potent than the Packers’ offensive weapons.
This performance brings up an important question about the value of wide receivers in building a successful offense. Analytics suggest that there is a strong correlation between having top-tier receivers and overall offensive efficiency. However, it’s also true that a powerful offensive line can elevate a team’s success, sometimes even more so than having a deep receiving corps. Yet, the Vikings are a prime example of how elite wide receivers can transform an offense, even in the face of adversity like an injury to their star left tackle, Christian Darrisaw.
For the Packers, the lack of a similar level of talent at wide receiver was evident in their struggle to match the Vikings’ offensive output. “We gotta get pressure on these guys if they’re gonna drop back so many times,” LaFleur added. “If you don’t, it’s gonna be a long day. It’s tough to try to go single coverage on Justin Jefferson, then you’ve got Jordan Addison, Hockenson, they’ve got multiple players. Nailor was making plays out there. So, they’ve got a lot of good players.”
Looking back at the Packers’ 2023 draft decisions, it’s clear they passed on opportunities to select top wide receivers like Addison, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, and Zay Flowers in favor of other prospects, including Lukas Van Ness. While Van Ness may prove to be valuable down the line, it’s hard to argue that the wide receivers selected elsewhere haven’t had a more immediate and impactful role in their respective teams.
Yet, this decision-making reflects how the Packers perceive value. Gutekunst and the front office have built the team with a focus on defense and balance, often opting for players who can contribute across multiple facets of the game. While this strategy has its merits and has worked in many instances, there’s an undeniable downside to not prioritizing elite offensive talent.
As the Packers move forward, particularly as they evaluate their roster and potential draft picks, it will be interesting to see if they continue to pass on the opportunity to bring in high-level receiving talent or if they adjust their approach to reflect the growing importance of wide receivers in today’s NFL. For now, the Packers’ receiving room, while solid, still has a noticeable gap when compared to the elite units of teams like the Vikings, and that gap could prove to be a challenge as they continue their pursuit of championship contention.